SaaS ideas worth building, backed by 160K+ complaints
100 SaaS and micro SaaS ideas, each with its proof: how many people describe the problem, who already pays to fix it, and their own words.
- Indie Hackers
- Bluesky
- Hacker News
- Product Hunt
- Stack Exchange
- App Store
- n8n
- Make
- Bubble
- Google Play · Coming soon
Every idea, with its evidence
Three ideas, as the research found them
- How many people describe the pain, in how many communities
- Who pays or would pay, and how many feel the cost
- The tools they use today
- Their own words, with where they said them
How it works
From people's complaintsto ideas worth building
We read billions of posts and comments on Reddit, kept the real complaints, looked for each pain on 9 more platforms and communities and hand you scored SaaS ideas.
Communities
- Indie Hackers
- Bluesky
Tech and launches
- Hacker News
- Product Hunt
- Stack Exchange
App stores
- App Store
- Google PlayComing soon
Tool communities
- n8n
- Make
- Bubble
Five-step analysis
- Screen
- Extract
- Group
- Research
- Score
Validated with these tools
SemrushSearches and click prices
Google SERPWho ranks on the first page
SimilarwebRivals' visits
SpyFuRivals' ads
MozRivals' authority
Inside every idea
Everything you need to decide,on one page
Every idea opens on one score , the proof behind it,
today's competitors and what could kill it.
Lead Quality Grader for Meta Ads Agencies
Grades agency Meta leads Fit or Junk, then trains Meta.
The score, part by part
- The research found an opening40/40
- People who pay or would pay24/25
- People who describe the pain13/15
- Hit at least weekly10/12
- Upvotes on their posts5/8
The proof
- 1.9 K people describe it
- 243 pay or would pay
- 83% hit it at least weekly
Today's competitors
- LeadSync$19 Business
- LeadsBridgeStarter up to 2 000 leads
- WhatConverts$30 to $160 per business
The opening: Sell agencies a client-signed AI Fit or Junk grade for Meta leads, aimed at clients whose reps never mark outcomes
What could kill it
6 weeks to a first version
- 1
One score, explained
Five parts add up to 100, each with the fact behind it. Gold, green, yellow or red at a glance.
- 2
The proof, in numbers
How many people describe the problem, who pays or would pay, and how often it hits them.
- 3
Today's competitors
The tools already selling a fix, their prices, and the opening they leave.
- 4
What could kill it
An independent skeptic's points, and the weeks it takes to a first version.
In their own words
Pain, quoted word for word
Every pain point comes with what people actually wrote, and where: the platform and the community. Never a username.
You can start working in Codex with a perfectly normal model, and five minutes later, IN THE SAME THREAD, they degrade it.
The Waymo app is not saying "We cannot get to you because of construction", the app is telling me that requests have been paused.
I can literally see the complete order with the names sitting on the table right behind you. Why did you skip bagging it up?
I run a ceramics shop and getting realistic glaze textures on 3D models used to require outside software.
Somebody needs to go find the right person at each one (specific seniority, has to be someone who can actually say yes) plus a working email
What im trying to achive is an automation that based on customer information it gives me the list of materials.
I kept hitting my weekly Fable limit too fast and have been experimenting because it's great but just too expensive/limited.
I lost $130 because of booksy systems error when the client tapped his card, the screen went on pending mode.
It's becoming difficult to keep track of who has responded, which leads need follow-ups, and where each prospect is in the sales process.
The complaint is almost always the same: I had to verify every number, and the ones I checked were wrong or invented.
What should I be measuring to know if the $89 is worth it? Is there a way to calculate the ROI on a tool like this?
Keeping business context, naming conventions, past tests, workflows, and client-specific rules consistent seems like one of the harder problems.
Ready to get started?
Start building somethingpeople already pay to fix.
Skip the guesswork: 100 SaaS ideas from billions of Reddit posts and comments, each with one score and the evidence behind it.
Your AI checks the real demandbefore it builds
SaaS Ideas MCP connects Claude, ChatGPT or Cursor to real complaints from Reddit, and the same pains on 9 more platforms and communities. Ask it what to build, and it answers with proof: who has the problem, who pays to fix it, and their own words.
- Claude
- ChatGPT
- Cursor
- Gemini
Is there real demand for catching junk leads from agencies' Meta ads?
13 pain points and 1 scored idea found
Yes, and it's frequent. 1.9K people describe this problem, 83% hit it at least weekly, and 240+ pay or would pay to fix it.
The strongest idea here
Grades agency Meta leads Fit or Junk, then trains Meta.
In their own words
“the CPL can look fine, but the actual lead quality is terrible”
From idea to product
You pick the winning idea.Build it with any AI.
SaaS Ideas proves the problem in people's own words, with who pays and how often. Take the idea into the AI you build with and start shipping, without guessing what to build.
Browse the 100 ideas- Cursor
- Claude
- ChatGPT
- Lovable
- Replit
- Gemini
Pricing
Start free, open the best ideas with Pro
The 26 recommended ideas in full, with new ones every month.
- All 100 idea cards, each with its score
- 4 ideas fully open
- Why 73 are not recommended, and the tools that already cover them
- The 26 recommended ideas, marked
- Every pain point, in people's own words
- The full analysis of the 26 recommended ideas
- New ideas every month
- Who buys, today's competitors and their prices, and a two-week test
- Every one of the 100 ideas in full
- Cancel anytime
Business
For agencies, studios and investors who want the research run on their own market.
Custom
Contact us- Everything in Pro
- Pain points researched in your market or niche
- Ideas scored for your clients or your portfolio
- The data in a file for your own tools
- A person to talk to
What Pro opens
FAQ
Questions, answered
Where the data comes from, what you get, and how it works.
Aren't these just ideas an AI made up?
No. They start from real pain points people wrote on platforms like Reddit, Hacker News, the App Store and Product Hunt, and each idea counts its own people. Then it is checked against today's competitors and attacked by an independent skeptic before it gets its score, and validated with Semrush, Google SERP, Similarweb, SpyFu and Moz.
Can't I just search Reddit myself?
You can. We read and analyse billions of posts and comments so you don't have to, with new ones added each month, and count how many different people describe each pain and how many already pay for a fix.
How do I validate a SaaS idea?
Answer six questions from what buyers already say and do: will they pay, is it big enough, is it crowded, where do I find them, how do I test it first, and what could kill it. Then run a two-week test that asks for money. Every idea here comes with those answers and its own test.
The method, shown on a real ideaI have no idea yet. Where do I start?
Start from a problem people already pay to get rid of, not from a brainstorm. One guide walks you through finding it, and the other lists real problems to solve, with how many people have each one.
I want to start a business but have no ideasProblems to solveIs someone already selling it?
Each idea names today's competitors and their prices. The score only goes high when the research finds an opening they miss.
What do I get?
Free: all the researched ideas, each with a score out of 100, colored from gold to red, and the evidence behind it (how many people, how often, who already pays); for the ideas that are not recommended, why not and the tools that already cover them; 4 ideas in full. Pro opens the recommended ideas in full (who buys, the version to build first, today's competitors and their prices, a two-week test) and the new ones every month.
How often is it updated?
Every month: new posts are mined, scores are refreshed and newly researched ideas are added, so the list keeps growing.