SaaS ideas your next customers are already looking for
100 SaaS startup ideas for the people who said they'd pay, from agency owners to dentists. Micro SaaS ideas, AI SaaS ideas and B2B SaaS ideas: find yours, build it, sign them up.
Popular:
| # | Idea |
|---|
No idea matches this filter.
Pain points in business: what people struggle with
Search the problems to solve, as people described them on Reddit and other platforms, in their own words.
Popular:
| # | Pain point |
|---|
No pain point matches this filter.
Leaver App Seat Cleanup for IT Service Firms
Closes leavers' unused app seats across all of an MSP's clients.
MSPs track app seats in spreadsheets, so leavers keep paid licenses and access. This tool finds a leaver's seats and closes them on approval.
The evidence
Score: 39 out of 100
- No opening found
- 72 pay or would pay
- 1.3K people describe it
- 30% hit it at least weekly
- 25K upvotes on their posts
Rewst, CloudM, JumpCloud and Augmentt already run multi-client offboarding; demand is vendor-inflated and the Google-only slice is thin.
In their words
it doesn't remove all licenses all the time, so we find at next renewal they have it assigned still.
People leave, contractors roll off, apps get retired, but the identity or service account somehow survives because nobody owns the cleanup.
How can I design a centralized license and access management system that automatically reassigns software licenses when an employee leaves, securely manages admin roles and Entra ID/SharePoint access, and automates license assignment and renewals?
The tools that already cover it
- AccessOwl: 120+ lean teams, 400+ integrations incl. no-API apps; no MSP or multi-tenant mention on its site, but could add an MSP view fast.
- Rewst: Automation toolkit for MSPs with an offboarding use case; the MSP must build and maintain each workflow.
- CloudM: Leaver workflows for Google Workspace and Microsoft 365 with license reclaim; Slack and Zoom seats not shown.
- JumpCloud (MSP portal): Wants to be the client's identity layer, not a sweeper over their existing Google or Slack setup.
- Augmentt: Multi-tenant Microsoft 365 security platform; offboarding is a helpdesk task, SaaS discovery sold separately.
- CIPP (CyberDrain): Microsoft 365 and Azure only; MSPs host and maintain it themselves.
- Corma: Homepage shows no MSP or multi-tenant support; automated provisioning sits in demo-priced tiers.
- BetterCloud: Strong at non-SSO offboarding but priced per managed user for mid-market, not MSP multi-client.
How it was challenged
- Demand is vendor-inflated: all 9 AccessOwl mentions come from two AccessOwl-linked accounts; only about 36 of 135 mentions sit in IT subreddits, 23 in founder subreddits.
- Sampled on-topic pains include staff of Rippling, AccessOwl and Tequipy; strip them and about 13 organic posts remain, with one r/msp thread and no MSP naming a budget.
- The wedge is thin: free CIPP covers Microsoft 365, so the tool serves only leftover Google, Slack and Zoom clients that Rewst and CloudM already reach.
- Rivals are free or already owned: GAM scripts, CIPP, Rewst; and savings go to clients while resellers likely earn margin on idle seats.
- Holding admin access to many small client tenants makes the tool a breach target; MSP buyers will demand security proof, and a wrong removal creates liability.
The pain point it solves: Access Governance Drift
Organizations lack a unified, automated way to track, review, and revoke user and service access across fragmented identity systems, causing drift, audit failures, and stale credentials.
IT and security teams
Where they talk
- r/IdentityManagement
- r/sysadmin
- r/cybersecurity
- r/AskNetsec
- r/entra
- r/aws
- r/kubernetes
- r/AZURE
Tools they use today
- Microsoft Entra
- Active Directory
- IGA
- Okta
- SailPoint
- IdP
- PowerShell
- Saviynt
Why those fall short
- password manager not used or declined; LAPS undone; SSO not set up
- pen-testing didn't pick up storage integration and cross-account access issues
- Needed permissions only appear at runtime; logs lack the specific permission identifier
- reviews only catch offboarding failures after the fact; managers approve all
- Assessors reject JIT; self-updaters need elevation; users still need manual workarounds
Map of ideas
Drawing the map…





