SaaS ideas your next customers are already looking for
100 SaaS startup ideas for the people who said they'd pay, from agency owners to dentists. Micro SaaS ideas, AI SaaS ideas and B2B SaaS ideas: find yours, build it, sign them up.
Popular:
| # | Idea |
|---|
No idea matches this filter.
Pain points in business: what people struggle with
Search the problems to solve, as people described them on Reddit and other platforms, in their own words.
Popular:
| # | Pain point |
|---|
No pain point matches this filter.
Scattered Research Tools
Researchers struggle with scattered tools and manual processes for managing sources, citations, notes, and writing, leading to lost time and disorganized work.
In their words
I think you could charge for something like a 2-way Zotero integration or Obsidian integration
we have to move across multiple platforms, so I was wondering if there’s a single platform for everything.
We basically need to put all the article in a better digital format easy to read, seeach and navigate.
The tool has been wildly inconsistent in its results and I can't rely on it to make a rough draft TOA without it jeopardizing the rest of the document.
I ran all 27 references through an automated checker and then verified the flagged ones by hand. 15 were fabricated or couldn't be matched to any real publication.
I don't have the patience or drive to keep up on manually entering every single detail into another service when I can just click a few buttons instead.
within a week we have written like 3 projects around "Sustainability" that were 100% created by AI without ever engaging with the people who will be involved
We are an Alma shop now and are considering the feasibility of cataloging and doing ILL without OCLC.
How is a contributor supposed to know that an image is already in your database before submitting it?
I am still trying to figure out the threshold - when is a citation bad enough to delete vs. just leave alone?
The amount of faculty who send in their stuff to be proofed blows my mind.
If it was a standard, I could do it once and send it to many. It is NOT a standard. They all want different formats.
reformatting the same paper's citations and bibliography for a different venue after a rejection is my most hated part.
I've got jr faculty juggling readers' reports, book workshop feedback, a micromanaging chair, well-meaning but clueless colleagues, and sometimes an agent.
Bluesky
Researchers and students
Where they talk
- r/PhdProductivity
- r/PhD
- r/Professors
- r/labrats
- r/ClaudeAI
- r/ObsidianMD
- r/AskAcademia
- r/AI_Agents
Tools they use today
- Zotero
- Obsidian
- Claude
- Word
- Notion
- Google Scholar
- git
- NotebookLM
Why those fall short
- Known papers do not appear; results are junk and inconsistent
- Notion too slow and structured; Apple Notes lacks backlinks and plugins
- verification is a separate manual act, not integrated into the editorial pipeline
- Zotero adds an extra layer of organisation to maintain
- flagged references still need hand verification; no reply from authors
Map of ideas
Drawing the map…