SaaS ideas your next customers are already looking for
100 SaaS startup ideas for the people who said they'd pay, from agency owners to dentists. Micro SaaS ideas, AI SaaS ideas and B2B SaaS ideas: find yours, build it, sign them up.
Popular:
| # | Idea |
|---|
No idea matches this filter.
Pain points in business: what people struggle with
Search the problems to solve, as people described them on Reddit and other platforms, in their own words.
Popular:
| # | Pain point |
|---|
No pain point matches this filter.
Vulnerability Triage Overload
Security teams drown in noisy, duplicate scanner findings and cannot prioritize which vulnerabilities are actually exploitable or worth fixing first.
In their words
same CVE shows up from three scanners with different severities, different descriptions and sometimes different affected assets
SAST and DAST are flooding our Jira backlog with thousands of "High" and "Critical" findings.
we don't have the time to babysit another platform or sift through thousands of findings every week
Faster discovery doesn't give you an AI problem, it gives you the same remediation problem you've always had, just compressed into a much smaller window.
I'm looking to replace our legacy vulnerability scanner with a proper Exposure Management platform.
they're off the shelf tools that don't cater for our unique environnement and the shed loads of technical debt we have, and they don't do the attack path analysis
I'm just going through trash and doing data entry.
Half of these bugs dont even make sense if you take the entire codebase deployment in context.
Is there a way to automate this discovery/evidence gathering?
writing a proper exception per CVE takes forever
We simply can't fix the "vulnerabilities" quicker than AI is hallucinating them.
here is what I found a week away from deployment to production
serious software is drowning in AI vulnerability reports. There is not enough manpower to analyze them properly.
is there a way to accept/allowlist a specific CVE on a specific image so it stops nagging you about something you've already decided is an acceptable risk?
Security and AppSec teams
Where they talk
- r/cybersecurity
- r/AskNetsec
- r/devsecops
- r/sysadmin
- r/blueteamsec
- r/devops
- r/grc
- r/aws
Tools they use today
- Tenable
- Jira
- CVSS
- EPSS
- Qualys
- Trivy
- ServiceNow
- Snyk
Why those fall short
- scanners lack business context, asset criticality and attack-path awareness
- bugs ignore deployment context and make no sense
- scanners show what exists, not reachability; verdicts never become paperwork
- still requires manual triage and false positive removal every cycle
- vendor scores biased to old risk triaging, reporting capabilities bad
Map of ideas
Drawing the map…