SaaS ideas your next customers are already looking for
100 SaaS startup ideas for the people who said they'd pay, from agency owners to dentists. Micro SaaS ideas, AI SaaS ideas and B2B SaaS ideas: find yours, build it, sign them up.
Popular:
| # | Idea |
|---|
No idea matches this filter.
Pain points in business: what people struggle with
Search the problems to solve, as people described them on Reddit and other platforms, in their own words.
Popular:
| # | Pain point |
|---|
No pain point matches this filter.
AI Citation Tracking Gaps
Marketers and SEO teams cannot reliably measure, track, or influence whether their content and brand get cited by AI answer engines.
In their words
It hallucinates constantly, gives me information I didn't ask for, and keeps getting thinner in what the subscription provides
we decided to stop guessing about AEO and actually test what changes citation behavior
The data is there, but turning it into "change this page, publish there" is all manual work.
manual logging was getting unwieldy past week 2
We're getting cited accurately — the number is right, the source is correct — but the surrounding context reframes our finding into an argument we never made.
did your tool actually change whether an LLM mentions my product... Did the citation happen or not.
I honestly can't tell how much of the improvement was "the work" versus "the model simply updated."
some barely showed up at all while weaker pages were getting picked for questions I didn't expect
Why would I use something that I have to go back to state statutes to verify when i could just use the state statutes directly?
Is there any tool or method to find the actual prompts/queries where my website or brand is mentioned or cited across ChatGPT, Gemini, Google AI Overviews, Perplexity, and Claude?
ai overviews are on almost every search in our niche now and never cite us.. how are you getting pulled into them
what tools are you using as alternatives to Profound for tracking citations, prompts and AI brand visibility across ChatGPT, Gemini, and Perplexity?
SEO and marketing teams
Where they talk
- r/aeo
- r/GEO_optimization
- r/DigitalMarketing
- r/GrowthHacking
- r/TechSEO
- r/content_marketing
- r/localseo
- r/Agentic_SEO
Tools they use today
- Perplexity
- Gemini
- Google Search Console
- Profound
- Claude
- Otterly
- Ahrefs
- Semrush
Why those fall short
- hallucinates, gives unasked info, thinner subscription, reduced query limits
- Students click links but do not read or verify the source
- Manual citation pulling is a nightmare; no before/after data to attribute lift.
- Citation tracking is synthetic polling, not real per-user citation data
- Sources shift between runs; one appearance tells you nothing.
Map of ideas
Drawing the map…