Sign inSign up
Launch week: every idea card is free.Get Pro

SaaS ideas, mined from what people actually complain about.

Every idea comes from real Reddit posts, was researched against today's competitors, and survived an independent skeptic before it made the list.

Recruiting pain points

Search 9 problems in Recruiting that people described on Reddit and other platforms.

Popular:
Pay or would payFeel the cost (time or money)Neutral (no money mentioned)

    What people report in Recruiting

    The hiring funnel clogs at its top end. AI Resume Screening Overload reaches Recruiters and job seekers (283 people, 32 who pay or would pay, 83% weekly): screening and application work is repetitive and manual, and the surge of AI-written applications has overwhelmed them. ATS bots read only plainly formatted Word documents. Flood of AI Job Applications (Recruiters and hiring managers, 209 people, 158 reporting a cost, 63% weekly) adds AI resumes that hit every keyword, so screeners lose sight of genuine experience, while the ATS does little beyond filing.

    Application Screening Overload (Hiring managers and recruiters, 245 people, 131 reporting a cost, 27% weekly) shows the price of keyword filters: they bypass qualified candidates and pass unqualified ones, and there is no way to credit near matches or synonyms. Broken Hiring Funnel (Job seekers and recruiters, 254 people, 54% weekly) is the other side, with data re-entered because uploaded resumes compile wrongly, a filter that demanded React.js when the CV said React, and employers reading only the first applicants.

    Scattered Hiring Pipeline (Recruiters and hiring managers) has the biggest audience listed, 338 people, with 155 reporting a cost and 74% weekly: tasks, data and messages live across disconnected tools, automated emails go out with no pause or confirmation step, and false rejections cannot be stopped. Manual Appointment Scheduling (Service businesses and professionals, 273 people, 83% weekly) has a bot that books without blocking unavailable time, so the hiring manager never sees the interviewee on the invite.

    Sourcing is where the money sits. Candidate Sourcing Gaps (194 people, the smallest audience listed) has 42 payers, the highest number, and 72% weekly. Candidate matching costs $85/day, reach is poor, budgets burn fast, minimum spends climb and what comes back is unqualified or erratic. LinkedIn, Indeed, Workday, Prospeo and Apollo are named across the field, along with ATS and Google Calendar.

    Candidate Sourcing Gaps has the money, and AI Resume Screening Overload follows with 32 payers and 83% weekly.